We all like to share their ideas on social applications from abroad of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, app, circle of friends at home, everything we publish, forward, all direct or indirect expression of our values. Meanwhile, these platforms also became another important channel of news events.
Shooting video "was played" by netizens ridicule
Today's big news is that the media cannot be avoided United States Virginia shootings that occurred, a reporter and a photographer were shot in live. Within a short time the news on social media has been widely spread.
According to sources, the killers were two former colleagues of the victim. More appalling is that this name Vester Lee Flanagan II suspects shortly after the incident, in the Twitter and Facebook was released with the first-person perspective shooting murder video.
"I took a shot video, details of Facebook," he wrote on Twitter. Soon after he posted this video on Twitter.
Although the two Vester Lee Flanagan II post video shortly after they deleted the video, and harmony of his account, but based on the particularity of the large user base, as well as video content, video has rapidly spread before it was deleted, because the video itself is the default auto-play on the platform, a lot of people have inadvertently viewed the video. Just Cavalli iPhone case
Facebook launched video AutoPlay in 2013, while Twitter is officially launched this year. This feature because of the shooting incident to ridicule.
Many users tweets said they were shaken, a user named Barzin Keywan says:
"Thanks for the" bi-"the AutoPlay feature, I just ' viewed ' the killer shot shooting video, feel very uncomfortable. Do not watch! "
Now the two companies have not yet to comment.
By Lei feng's network research, Twitter's media policy, be marked as "sensitive" the video will not play automatically. Reports according to buzzfeed, Facebook declined to comment, said it had removed only a breach of the company "community standards" of pages and content.
Sensitive content "harmonized", save the moral dilemma
In fact there is a strange paradox.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BISfMD-fk6I
A blog can be a "harmonious", a sufficient condition for it is widely spread. Only if it has a negative social impact, triggering social network administrator's attention, in order to prevent the situation from expanding will be ordered removed. However before the administrator notices that must have caused a certain degree of spread. More serious is that this entry deleted will make uninformed users trigger a strong curiosity, formation of explosive proliferation.
Have to say, that violent offenders in the Centre ' hands. They hope, is that it get more discussion, more communication. Video Autoplay feature, gives them a hotbed of crime spread.
Although the violence is less, but as long as the AutoPlay function exists, so that similar events are likely to happen again, users may "be seen" not appropriate content. However, which seemed too beat him of choking. The filtering of sensitive information, most rely on users to report sensitive information, networking administrators also have responsibilities, but in the face of huge amounts of content, was powerless.
Such a moral dilemma, there has never been a standard answer. What do you think of it? Welcome message and we're talking about.
1950 votes
Oculus Rift in virtual reality
Might as well try to pleasantly lazy on the sofa in your House hold, through the heart in his hand and cool flying hearts drinks, wearing virtual reality glasses, tried in a classic virtual tour. No longer have to save money by booking hotels to worry about, will not have Jet lag problem, of course, you don't have to go to in line to buy train tickets, air tickets in advance.
View details of the voting >> Just Cavalli iPhone case
